Microsoft Copilot Studio Cloud Console Private API Service insufficient logging
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Microsoft Copilot Studio. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Cloud Console Private API Service. This manipulation causes insufficient logging. There is not any exploit available. This product is a managed service. This means that users are not able to maintain vulnerability countermeasures themselves.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Microsoft Copilot Studio (affected version unknown). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Cloud Console Private API Service. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a insufficient logging vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-778. When a security-critical event occurs, the product either does not record the event or omits important details about the event when logging it. As an impact it is known to affect availability.
The advisory is shared at tenable.com. The exploitation appears to be easy. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/25/2024). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1562.002 for this issue.
This product is available as a managed service. Users are not able to maintain vulnerability countermeasures themselves.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Managed Service
- yes
Website
- Vendor: https://www.microsoft.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Insufficient loggingCWE: CWE-778
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Status: 🔍0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/25/2024 🔍09/25/2024 🔍
09/25/2024 🔍
Sources
Vendor: microsoft.comAdvisory: tenable.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: Not possible due to CNA Operational Rules
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-278461
Entry
Created: 09/25/2024 15:24Changes: 09/25/2024 15:24 (52)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.