YaPIG up to 0.95b mod_info modify_gallery.php cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in YaPIG 0.92b/0.93u/0.94u/0.95/0.95b. This affects an unknown part of the file modify_gallery.php of the component mod_info. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2005-4801. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in YaPIG 0.92b/0.93u/0.94u/0.95/0.95b. This affects some unknown functionality of the file modify_gallery.php of the component mod_info. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Yet Another PHP Image Gallery (YaPIG) 0.95b and earlier allow remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as a logged-in user, as demonstrated by tricking the administrator to access a web page that performs a mod_info action in modify_gallery.php.
The weakness was disclosed 12/31/2005 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2005-4801 since 05/15/2006. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
By approaching the search of inurl:modify_gallery.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (22753) and Secunia (SA17041†). The entries VDB-28106, VDB-28105 and VDB-82916 are pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/13/2005 🔍12/31/2005 🔍
12/31/2005 🔍
05/15/2006 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
07/16/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2005-4801 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-4801
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-28107
X-Force: 22753 - YaPiG modify_gallery.php code execution
Secunia: 17041 - YaPiG Multiple Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 11:11Updated: 07/16/2018 09:24
Changes: 03/12/2015 11:11 (47), 07/16/2018 09:24 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.