| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Neon Software Neon Responder 5.4. It has been classified as problematic. This impacts an unknown function. This manipulation causes denial of service. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2006-1941. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Neon Software Neon Responder 5.4. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
Neon Responder 5.4 for LANsurveyor allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application outage) via a crafted Clock Synchronisation packet that triggers an access violation.
The weakness was disclosed 04/20/2006 as not defined posting (Bugtraq). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2006-1941 since 04/20/2006. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
A public exploit has been developed in ANSI C. It is possible to download the exploit at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (25904), Exploit-DB (27668), SecurityFocus (BID 17569†), Secunia (SA19702†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1015950†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/10/2006 🔍04/18/2006 🔍
04/20/2006 🔍
04/20/2006 🔍
04/20/2006 🔍
04/20/2006 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
04/07/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2006-1941 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-1941
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-29797
X-Force: 25904 - Neon Responder Clock Synchronization packet denial of service
SecurityFocus: 17569 - Neon Responders Remote Clock Synchronization Denial of Service Vulnerability
Secunia: 19702 - Neon Responders "Clock Synchronisation" Packet Denial of Service, Less Critical
SecurityTracker: 1015950 - Neon Responders for Windows Can Be Crashed By Remote Users
Vupen: ADV-2006-1442
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 12:19Updated: 04/07/2025 04:32
Changes: 03/12/2015 12:19 (58), 09/10/2017 10:40 (8), 04/07/2025 04:32 (21)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.