| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Russcom Network Loginphp. This affects an unknown function of the file help.php. Performing a manipulation results in authentication spoofing. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2006-2159. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Russcom Network Loginphp (the affected version is unknown). This affects an unknown code of the file help.php. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authentication spoofing vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-290. This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
CRLF injection vulnerability in help.php in Russcom Network Loginphp allows remote attackers to spoof e-mails and inject MIME headers via CRLF sequences in the email address.
The weakness was disclosed 05/03/2006 by Nomenumbra (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2006-2159 since 05/03/2006. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details and a exploit are known.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:help.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (26250), SecurityFocus (BID 17787†), OSVDB (25214†) and Secunia (SA19930†). The entry VDB-30028 is pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Authentication spoofingCWE: CWE-290 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/02/2006 🔍05/03/2006 🔍
05/03/2006 🔍
05/03/2006 🔍
05/03/2006 🔍
05/03/2006 🔍
05/03/2006 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
09/08/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Nomenumbra
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2006-2159 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-2159
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-30027
X-Force: 26250 - Russcom.Loginphp help.php mail relay
SecurityFocus: 17787 - Russcom Network LoginPHP Open EMail Relay Vulnerability
Secunia: 19930 - Russcom.Loginphp Script Insertion and Open Mail Relay, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 25214 - Russcom.Loginphp help.php Arbitrary Mail Relay
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 12:19Updated: 09/08/2017 09:16
Changes: 03/12/2015 12:19 (55), 09/08/2017 09:16 (8)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.