Pyrosoft Inc NetPanzer 0.8 lib/2d/surface.hpp setframe denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Pyrosoft Inc NetPanzer 0.8. It has been classified as problematic. This impacts the function setframe in the library lib/2d/surface.hpp. The manipulation leads to denial of service.
This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2006-2575. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Pyrosoft Inc NetPanzer 0.8. This issue affects the function setframe in the library lib/2d/surface.hpp. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
The setFrame function in Lib/2D/Surface.hpp for NetPanzer 0.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a client flag (frameNum) that is greater than 41, which triggers an assert error.
The weakness was presented 05/23/2006 by Luigi Auriemma (Website). The advisory is shared at vupen.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2006-2575 since 05/24/2006. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (26607), Exploit-DB (1820), SecurityFocus (BID 18104†), OSVDB (25737†) and Secunia (SA20250†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/23/2006 🔍05/23/2006 🔍
05/23/2006 🔍
05/24/2006 🔍
05/24/2006 🔍
05/24/2006 🔍
05/24/2006 🔍
05/24/2006 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
04/07/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: vupen.com⛔Researcher: Luigi Auriemma
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2006-2575 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-2575
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-30413
X-Force: 26607 - netPanzer frameNum denial of service
SecurityFocus: 18104
Secunia: 20250 - NetPanzer "setFrame()" Denial of Service Vulnerability, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 25737 - NetPanzer Surface.hpp setFrame() Remote DoS
SecurityTracker: 1016149
Vupen: ADV-2006-1939
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 12:19Updated: 04/07/2025 04:59
Changes: 03/12/2015 12:19 (67), 07/27/2018 09:10 (3), 04/07/2025 04:59 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.