70mai M300 up to 20250611 HTTP Server insufficiently protected credentials
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in 70mai M300 up to 20250611. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component HTTP Server. The manipulation leads to insufficiently protected credentials. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2025-6526. The attack must be carried out from within the local network. In addition, an exploit is available. It is recommended to apply restrictive firewalling. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in 70mai M300 up to 20250611. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component HTTP Server. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a insufficiently protected credentials vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-522. The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. Impacted is confidentiality.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-6526. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The attack can only be done within the local network. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1552 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The exploit is available at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Addressing this vulnerability is possible by firewalling .
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-18956). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Base Score: 3.1
VulDB Temp Score: 2.8
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.3
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 3.1
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Insufficiently protected credentialsCWE: CWE-522
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
06/23/2025 Advisory disclosed06/23/2025 VulDB entry created
11/14/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-6526 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-6526
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-313643
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 06/23/2025 16:16Updated: 11/14/2025 16:12
Changes: 06/23/2025 16:16 (56), 06/24/2025 01:18 (1), 06/24/2025 10:34 (30), 06/27/2025 05:27 (1), 11/14/2025 16:12 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: geochen
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #595447: 70mai dashcam M300 Improper Access Controls (by geochen)
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.