Touch Control ActiveX control 2.0.0.55 Execute sPath Remote Code Execution
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Touch Control ActiveX control 2.0.0.55. This issue affects the function Execute. This manipulation of the argument sPath causes Remote Code Execution.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2006-3762. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Touch Control ActiveX control 2.0.0.55. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Execute. The manipulation of the argument sPath with an unknown input leads to a remote code execution vulnerability. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The Touch Control ActiveX control 2.0.0.55 allows remote attackers to read and possibly execute arbitrary files via a "file///" URI in the sPath parameter to the Execute function.
The weakness was presented 07/21/2006 as not defined posting (Bugtraq). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2006-3762 since 07/20/2006. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Remote Code ExecutionCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/20/2006 🔍07/21/2006 🔍
07/21/2006 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
09/18/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2006-3762 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-3762
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-31453
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 14:25Updated: 09/18/2017 11:35
Changes: 03/12/2015 14:25 (45), 09/18/2017 11:35 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.