Cimmetry Systems AutoVue SolidModel Professional 19.1 stack-based overflow

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.4$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Cimmetry Systems AutoVue SolidModel Professional 19.1 and classified as critical. This affects an unknown function of the component AutoVue. Performing a manipulation results in stack-based overflow. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2006-3350. No exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Cimmetry Systems AutoVue SolidModel Professional 19.1. This affects an unknown part of the component AutoVue. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a stack-based overflow vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-121. A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function). This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Stack-based buffer overflow in AutoVue SolidModel Professional Desktop Edition 19.1 Build 5993 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in a (1) ARJ, (2) RAR, or (3) ZIP archive.

The bug was discovered 07/07/2006. The weakness was published 07/26/2006 by Tan Chew Keong with Secunia Research (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2006-3350 since 07/05/2006. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 19 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (27968), SecurityFocus (BID 19170†), OSVDB (27516†) and Secunia (SA20852†). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4

VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Stack-based overflow
CWE: CWE-121 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

07/05/2006 🔍
07/07/2006 +2 days 🔍
07/26/2006 +19 days 🔍
07/26/2006 +0 days 🔍
07/26/2006 +0 days 🔍
07/26/2006 +0 days 🔍
07/27/2006 +0 days 🔍
03/12/2015 +3150 days 🔍
09/16/2017 +919 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: securityfocus.com
Researcher: Tan Chew Keong
Organization: Secunia Research
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2006-3350 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-3350
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-31545
X-Force: 27968 - AutoVue SolidModel Professional archive filename buffer overflow
SecurityFocus: 19170 - AutoVue SolidModel Professional Archive Multiple Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 20852 - AutoVue SolidModel Professional Buffer Overflow Vulnerability, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 27516 - AutoVue SolidModel Professional Multiple Archive Filename Handling Overflow
Vupen: ADV-2006-2979

Entryinfo

Created: 03/12/2015 14:25
Updated: 09/16/2017 10:38
Changes: 03/12/2015 14:25 (59), 09/16/2017 10:38 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!