Digilent DASYLab DSB File Parser improper validation of specified index, position, or offset in input
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Digilent DASYLab. Affected is an unknown function of the component DSB File Parser. The manipulation leads to improper validation of specified index, position, or offset in input. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2025-57778. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Digilent DASYLab (affected version unknown). This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component DSB File Parser. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper validation of specified index, position, or offset in input vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-1285. The product receives input that is expected to specify an index, position, or offset into an indexable resource such as a buffer or file, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the specified index/position/offset has the required properties. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
There is an out of bounds write vulnerability due to improper bounds checking resulting in an invalid source address when parsing a DSB file with Digilent DASYLab. This vulnerability may result in arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted DSB file. The vulnerability affects all versions of DASYLab.
The weakness was released by Kimiya. It is possible to read the advisory at ni.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-57778 since 08/19/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/02/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.8
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper validation of specified index, position, or offset in inputCWE: CWE-1285
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/19/2025 CVE reserved09/02/2025 Advisory disclosed
09/02/2025 VulDB entry created
09/02/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: ni.comResearcher: Kimiya
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-57778 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-57778
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-322211
Entry
Created: 09/02/2025 20:30Changes: 09/02/2025 20:30 (72)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.