Nick Ciske To Lead for Salesforce Plugin up to 2.7.3.9 on WordPress cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Nick Ciske To Lead for Salesforce Plugin up to 2.7.3.9 on WordPress. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2025-58809. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Nick Ciske To Lead for Salesforce Plugin up to 2.7.3.9 on WordPress. This issue affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nick Ciske To Lead For Salesforce allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects To Lead For Salesforce: from n/a through 2.7.3.9.
The weakness was released by Nguyen Xuan Chien. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-58809 since 09/05/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.1
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
09/05/2025 Advisory disclosed09/05/2025 CVE reserved
09/05/2025 VulDB entry created
09/05/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Nguyen Xuan Chien
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-58809 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-58809
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-322841
Entry
Created: 09/05/2025 17:28Changes: 09/05/2025 17:28 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.