Mailenable Enterprise up to 2.0 stack-based overflow

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
10.0$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Mailenable Enterprise up to 2.0. It has been rated as critical. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in stack-based overflow. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2006-6423. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, was found in Mailenable Enterprise up to 2.0 (Mail Server Software). This affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a stack-based overflow vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-121. A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function). This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP service for MailEnable Professional and Enterprise Edition 2.0 through 2.35, Professional Edition 1.6 through 1.84, and Enterprise Edition 1.1 through 1.41 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a pre-authentication command followed by a crafted parameter and a long string, as addressed by the ME-10025 hotfix.

The weakness was shared 12/11/2006 with Secunia Research (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2006-6423 since 12/09/2006. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/03/2017).

A public exploit has been developed in Perl. The exploit is shared for download at securityfocus.com. It is declared as highly functional. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 23783 (MailEnable IMAP Server Multiple Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities (ME-10025)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Windows.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product. Furthermore it is possible to detect and prevent this kind of attack with TippingPoint and the filter 5158.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (30796), Tenable (23783), SecurityFocus (BID 21492†), Secunia (SA23201†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-13388†). The entries VDB-2707, VDB-2728, VDB-2727 and VDB-2767 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 10.0

VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Stack-based overflow
CWE: CWE-121 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Highly functional
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 23783
Nessus Name: MailEnable IMAP Server Multiple Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities (ME-10025)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍

MetaSploit ID: mailenable_login.rb
MetaSploit Name: MailEnable IMAPD (2.34/2.35) Login Request Buffer Overflow
MetaSploit File: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍
TippingPoint: 🔍

McAfee IPS: 🔍
McAfee IPS Version: 🔍

PaloAlto IPS: 🔍
Fortigate IPS: 🔍

Timelineinfo

12/08/2006 🔍
12/08/2006 +0 days 🔍
12/08/2006 +0 days 🔍
12/09/2006 +1 days 🔍
12/10/2006 +1 days 🔍
12/11/2006 +1 days 🔍
12/11/2006 +0 days 🔍
12/18/2006 +7 days 🔍
03/12/2015 +3006 days 🔍
09/03/2017 +906 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Organization: Secunia Research
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2006-6423 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-6423
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-33789
X-Force: 30796
SecurityFocus: 21492 - MailEnable IMAP Service Login Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Secunia: 23201 - MailEnable IMAP Service Buffer Overflow Vulnerability, Highly Critical
Vulnerability Center: 13388 - MailEnable IMAP Service Buffer Overflow via Long String, High

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/12/2015 22:21
Updated: 09/03/2017 14:55
Changes: 03/12/2015 22:21 (62), 09/03/2017 14:55 (18)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:C2F:103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!