Copeland XWEB 300D PRO/XWEB 500D PRO/XWEB 500B PRO up to 1.12.1 Template File os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Copeland XWEB 300D PRO, XWEB 500D PRO and XWEB 500B PRO up to 1.12.1. Affected is an unknown function of the component Template File Handler. The manipulation leads to os command injection. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-24452. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Copeland XWEB 300D PRO, XWEB 500D PRO and XWEB 500B PRO up to 1.12.1. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component Template File Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by supplying a crafted template file to the devices route.
The weakness was presented with Claroty Team82. It is possible to read the advisory at webapps.copeland.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-24452 since 02/05/2026. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The attack may be initiated remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are necessary for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 03/01/2026). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1202 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.8
VulDB Base Score: 6.6
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 8.0
CNA Vector (icscert): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
02/05/2026 CVE reserved02/27/2026 Advisory disclosed
02/27/2026 VulDB entry created
03/01/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: webapps.copeland.comOrganization: Claroty Team82
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-24452 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-24452
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-348083
Entry
Created: 02/27/2026 07:36Updated: 03/01/2026 17:23
Changes: 02/27/2026 07:36 (63), 03/01/2026 17:23 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.