Copeland XWEB 300D PRO/XWEB 500D PRO/XWEB 500B PRO up to 1.12.1 LCD os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Copeland XWEB 300D PRO, XWEB 500D PRO and XWEB 500B PRO up to 1.12.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component LCD Handler. The manipulation results in os command injection. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-25037. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Copeland XWEB 300D PRO, XWEB 500D PRO and XWEB 500B PRO up to 1.12.1. Affected is some unknown functionality of the component LCD Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by configuring a maliciously crafted LCD state which is later processed during system setup, enabling remote code execution.
The weakness was shared with Claroty Team82. The advisory is shared for download at webapps.copeland.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-25037 since 02/05/2026. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are needed for exploitation. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available. The current price for an exploit might be approx. USD $0-$5k (estimation calculated on 03/01/2026). The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1202.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.8
VulDB Base Score: 6.6
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 8.0
CNA Vector (icscert): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
02/05/2026 CVE reserved02/27/2026 Advisory disclosed
02/27/2026 VulDB entry created
03/01/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: webapps.copeland.comOrganization: Claroty Team82
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-25037 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-25037
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-348084
Entry
Created: 02/27/2026 07:36Updated: 03/01/2026 17:23
Changes: 02/27/2026 07:36 (63), 03/01/2026 17:23 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.