Copeland XWEB 300D PRO/XWEB 500D PRO/XWEB 500B PRO up to 1.12.1 Request Body os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Copeland XWEB 300D PRO, XWEB 500D PRO and XWEB 500B PRO up to 1.12.1. This impacts an unknown function of the component Request Body Handler. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection. This vulnerability was named CVE-2026-21389. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Copeland XWEB 300D PRO, XWEB 500D PRO and XWEB 500B PRO up to 1.12.1. This affects an unknown code of the component Request Body Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the request body sent to the contacts import route.
The weakness was presented with Claroty Team82. The advisory is shared at webapps.copeland.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-21389 since 02/05/2026. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are necessary for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 03/01/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.8
VulDB Base Score: 6.6
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 8.0
CNA Vector (icscert): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
02/05/2026 CVE reserved02/27/2026 Advisory disclosed
02/27/2026 VulDB entry created
03/01/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: webapps.copeland.comOrganization: Claroty Team82
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-21389 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-21389
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-348093
Entry
Created: 02/27/2026 07:41Updated: 03/01/2026 16:49
Changes: 02/27/2026 07:41 (63), 03/01/2026 16:49 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.