prompts.chat Authorization Header token server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in prompts.chat. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Authorization Header Handler. This manipulation of the argument token causes server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2026-22664. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in prompts.chat (affected version unknown). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Authorization Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument token with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
prompts.chat prior to commit 30a8f04 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in Fal.ai media status polling that allows authenticated users to perform arbitrary outbound requests by supplying attacker-controlled URLs in the token parameter. Attackers can exploit the lack of URL validation to disclose the FAL_API_KEY in the Authorization header, enabling credential theft, internal network probing, and abuse of the victim's Fal.ai account.
The weakness was published by mdisec. It is possible to read the advisory at gist.github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-22664 since 01/08/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
Applying the patch 30a8f0470e0ba45e6be9c9f55220f4a9a6b91c99 is able to eliminate this problem.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-18827). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.8
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.7
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Patch: 30a8f0470e0ba45e6be9c9f55220f4a9a6b91c99
Timeline
01/08/2026 CVE reserved04/03/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/03/2026 VulDB entry created
04/04/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: gist.github.comResearcher: mdisec
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-22664 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-22664
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-355195
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 04/03/2026 23:23Updated: 04/04/2026 05:09
Changes: 04/03/2026 23:23 (77), 04/04/2026 05:09 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:03A:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.