ggerve coding-standards-mcp server.py get_style_guide/get_best_practices Language path traversal
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in ggerve coding-standards-mcp. Impacted is the function get_style_guide/get_best_practices of the file server.py. This manipulation of the argument Language causes path traversal.
This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-7588. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available.
The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in ggerve coding-standards-mcp. Affected by this vulnerability is the function get_style_guide/get_best_practices of the file server.py. The manipulation of the argument language with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-7588. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-26704). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 5b097a3d6ff668d15c610911d20d2ce0d08cfc5a
- 94f619198724f79d1ea53992184eb4ba61418810
- c21ab2754684329eab4feb72427dc9acfe61e52f
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
05/01/2026 Advisory disclosed05/01/2026 VulDB entry created
05/01/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-7588 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-7588
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-360541
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 05/01/2026 11:35Updated: 05/01/2026 21:27
Changes: 05/01/2026 11:35 (58), 05/01/2026 11:40 (1), 05/01/2026 21:27 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: LargeW
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #804390: ggerve coding-standards-mcp c21ab2754684329eab4feb72427dc9acfe61e52f Path Traversal (by LargeW)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.