modelcontextprotocol registry up to 1.7.8 OCI Image failing open
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in modelcontextprotocol registry up to 1.7.8. The affected element is an unknown function of the component OCI Image Handler. Performing a manipulation results in failing open. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-45781. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in modelcontextprotocol registry up to 1.7.8. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown functionality of the component OCI Image Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a failing open vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-636. When the product encounters an error condition or failure, its design requires it to fall back to a state that is less secure than other options that are available, such as selecting the weakest encryption algorithm or using the most permissive access control restrictions. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The MCP Registry provides MCP clients with a list of MCP servers, like an app store for MCP servers. Prior to 1.7.9, OCI ownership validation skips label-match check when upstream OCI registry returns HTTP 429, letting any authenticated publisher bind their io.github.<user>/* namespace to OCI images they do not control. internal/validators/registries/oci.go:104-119 fails open on http.StatusTooManyRequests: when the registry's anonymous fetch to the upstream OCI registry is rate-limited, ValidateOCI returns nil and the publish is accepted without ever running the io.modelcontextprotocol.server.name label-match check at lines 122-141. That label check is the only cross-system ownership proof the registry applies to OCI packages — every other registry type (NPM, PyPI, NuGet, MCPB) treats a non-200 upstream response as a hard error. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.9.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-45781 since 05/13/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Upgrading to version 1.7.9 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-30489). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.8
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 3.5
CNA Vector (GitHub_M): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Failing openCWE: CWE-636
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: registry 1.7.9
Timeline
05/13/2026 CVE reserved05/15/2026 Advisory disclosed
05/15/2026 VulDB entry created
05/19/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: GHSA-2v5f-5r6w-p67r
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-45781 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-45781
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-364029
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 05/15/2026 04:25Updated: 05/19/2026 16:30
Changes: 05/15/2026 04:25 (64), 05/16/2026 08:59 (1), 05/19/2026 16:30 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.