| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 | $0-$5k | 4.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Node.js up to 22.22.3/24.16.0/26.3.0. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in toctou. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-48931. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Node.js up to 22.22.3/24.16.0/26.3.0. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a toctou vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-367. The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check. This can cause the product to perform invalid actions when the resource is in an unexpected state. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A flaw in Node.js HTTP Agent can cause a client to accept as valid a response that is send before the client has sent the request. This vulnerability affects all supported release lines: **Node.js 22**, **Node.js 24**, and **Node.js 26**.
It is possible to read the advisory at nodejs.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-48931 since 05/26/2026. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 321741 (Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-48931), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (321741). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 22.22.0
- 22.22.1
- 22.22.2
- 22.22.3
- 24.0
- 24.1
- 24.2
- 24.3
- 24.4
- 24.5
- 24.6
- 24.7
- 24.8
- 24.9
- 24.10
- 24.11
- 24.12
- 24.13
- 24.14
- 24.15
- 24.16.0
- 26.0
- 26.1
- 26.2
- 26.3.0
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 3.7
CNA Vector (hackerone): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: ToctouCWE: CWE-367 / CWE-362
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 321741
Nessus Name: Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-48931
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
05/26/2026 CVE reserved06/23/2026 Advisory disclosed
06/23/2026 VulDB entry created
06/23/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: 63989Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-48931 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-48931
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-372819
Entry
Created: 06/23/2026 07:06Updated: 06/23/2026 07:59
Changes: 06/23/2026 07:06 (61), 06/23/2026 07:59 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.