usememos Memos up to 0.29.1 Webhook URL Validation validate.go isReservedIP redirect
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 1.78 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in usememos Memos up to 0.29.1. It has been rated as problematic. This impacts the function isReservedIP of the file internal/webhook/validate.go of the component Webhook URL Validation. This manipulation causes redirect.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-71271. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in usememos Memos up to 0.29.1. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function isReservedIP of the file internal/webhook/validate.go of the component Webhook URL Validation. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a redirect vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-601. A web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a Redirect. This simplifies phishing attacks. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Memos' webhook URL validation, isReservedIP() (internal/webhook/validate.go), checks a candidate IP against a reservedCIDRs list that omits 0.0.0.0/8 and never calls ip.IsUnspecified() — unlike the correctly implemented sibling function isInternalIP() in internal/httpgetter/html_meta.go, which does. Because Linux redirects connections to 0.0.0.0 to loopback (127.0.0.1), an attacker registering a webhook URL of http://0.0.0.0:PORT/ bypasses the reserved-IP check and causes the Memos server to make outbound HTTP requests to its own loopback interface, exposing internal-only services.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-71271 since 08/05/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/05/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1204.001 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: RedirectCWE: CWE-601
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/05/2026 Advisory disclosed08/05/2026 CVE reserved
08/05/2026 VulDB entry created
08/05/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-71271 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-71271
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-386197
Entry
Created: 08/05/2026 15:25Changes: 08/05/2026 15:25 (55)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.