Dibbler 0.6.0 SrvOptIA_NA.cpp tsrvoptia_na::rebind input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Dibbler 0.6.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function tsrvoptia_na::rebind of the file SrvOptions/SrvOptIA_NA.cpp. Performing a manipulation results in input validation.
This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2007-5031. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Dibbler 0.6.0. This affects the function tsrvoptia_na::rebind of the file SrvOptions/SrvOptIA_NA.cpp. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
The TSrvOptIA_NA::rebind method in SrvOptions/SrvOptIA_NA.cpp in Dibbler 0.6.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and daemon crash) via an invalid IA_NA option in a REBIND message.
The weakness was disclosed 09/18/2007 by Mu Security with Mu Security research team (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at lists.grok.org.uk. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2007-5031 since 09/21/2007. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 25726†), OSVDB (40567†) and Secunia (SA26876†). The entries VDB-38906 and VDB-38905 are pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/18/2007 🔍09/19/2007 🔍
09/20/2007 🔍
09/21/2007 🔍
09/21/2007 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
07/29/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: lists.grok.org.ukResearcher: Mu Security
Organization: Mu Security research team
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2007-5031 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-5031
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-38907
X-Force: 36686
SecurityFocus: 25726 - Dibbler Multiple Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 26876
OSVDB: 40567 - Dibbler SrvOptions/SrvOptIA_NA.cpp TSrvOptIA_NA::rebind Method Malformed REBIND Message Remote DoS
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 12:18Updated: 07/29/2021 07:55
Changes: 03/16/2015 12:18 (50), 08/23/2017 11:53 (7), 07/29/2021 07:55 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.