Splitside Directory Image Gallery 1.1 photos.cfm backwardDirectory cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Splitside Directory Image Gallery 1.1. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file photos.cfm. The manipulation of the argument backwardDirectory leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2007-5292. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Splitside Directory Image Gallery 1.1 (Photo Gallery Software). It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code block of the file photos.cfm. The manipulation of the argument backwardDirectory with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in photos.cfm in Directory Image Gallery 1.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the backwardDirectory parameter.
The weakness was shared 10/07/2007 (Website). The advisory is shared at vupen.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2007-5292 since 10/09/2007. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
It is declared as highly functional. By approaching the search of inurl:photos.cfm it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (36986) and OSVDB (38629†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/07/2007 🔍10/09/2007 🔍
10/09/2007 🔍
11/13/2007 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
11/02/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: vupen.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2007-5292 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-5292
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-39149
X-Force: 36986 - Directory Image Gallery photos.cfm cross-site scripting
OSVDB: 38629 - Directory Image Gallery photos.cfm backwardDirectory Parameter XSS
Vupen: ADV-2007-3425
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 12:18Updated: 11/02/2017 10:44
Changes: 03/16/2015 12:18 (52), 11/02/2017 10:44 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.