Graylog2 graylog2-server up to 6.3.13/7.0.8/7.1.3 View Update API privileges management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 2.30- |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Graylog2 graylog2-server up to 6.3.13/7.0.8/7.1.3. This impacts an unknown function of the component View Update API. The manipulation leads to privileges management. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-69190. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Graylog2 graylog2-server up to 6.3.13/7.0.8/7.1.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component View Update API. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Graylog is a free and open log management platform. From 6.3.0 until 6.3.14, 7.0.9, and 7.1.4, the view update API for saved searches and dashboards permits a user with edit permission but without entity ownership to include a shareRequest that grants owner permissions to an arbitrary account. The selected account can then delete the saved search or dashboard or remove the original owner's access. Graylog Cloud was patched before the advisory was published. This issue is fixed in versions 6.3.14, 7.0.9, and 7.1.4.
The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-69190 since 08/03/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 6.3.14, 7.0.9 or 7.1.4 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 6.3.0
- 6.3.1
- 6.3.2
- 6.3.3
- 6.3.4
- 6.3.5
- 6.3.6
- 6.3.7
- 6.3.8
- 6.3.9
- 6.3.10
- 6.3.11
- 6.3.12
- 6.3.13
- 7.0.0
- 7.0.1
- 7.0.2
- 7.0.3
- 7.0.4
- 7.0.5
- 7.0.6
- 7.0.7
- 7.0.8
- 7.1.0
- 7.1.1
- 7.1.2
- 7.1.3
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.3
CNA Vector (GitHub_M): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: graylog2-server 6.3.14/7.0.9/7.1.4
Timeline
08/03/2026 CVE reserved09/21/2026 Advisory disclosed
09/21/2026 VulDB entry created
09/21/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-69190 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-69190
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-408197
Entry
Created: 09/21/2026 20:05Changes: 09/21/2026 20:05 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.