openclaw up to 2026.6.9 MCP Channel Bridge privileges management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 | $0-$5k | 0.54 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in openclaw and classified as critical. The affected element is an unknown function of the component MCP Channel Bridge. This manipulation causes privileges management. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-100585. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in openclaw. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the component MCP Channel Bridge. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
OpenClaw (npm package `openclaw`) before 2026.7.1 fails to enforce the owner-only authorization requirement for Claude Code permission prompts delivered through the MCP channel bridge. An authorized non-owner channel sender with channel command access can approve or deny a pending permission request intended for the owner, causing the requested action to proceed without owner consent. The practical impact depends on the pending action and the host capabilities requested by the Claude Code run. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-100585 since 09/26/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 2026.7.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 0.1.33
- 0.2.39
- 0.5.71
- 0.9.43
- 1.1.0
- 3.0.0
- 2026.1.20
- 2026.1.29
- 2026.1.30
- 2026.2.1
- 2026.2.2
- 2026.2.3
- 2026.2.5
- 2026.2.6
- 2026.2.12
- 2026.2.13
- 2026.2.14
- 2026.2.15
- 2026.2.17
- 2026.2.18
- 2026.2.19
- 2026.2.19-2
- 2026.2.19-beta.1
- 2026.2.21
- 2026.2.21-beta.1
- 2026.2.22
- 2026.2.23
- 2026.2.24
- 2026.2.25
- 2026.2.26
- 2026.3.1
- 2026.3.2
- 2026.3.7
- 2026.3.8
- 2026.3.11
- 2026.3.12
- 2026.3.13
- 2026.3.22
- 2026.3.23
- 2026.3.24
- 2026.3.25
- 2026.3.28
- 2026.3.31
- 2026.4.2
- 2026.4.4
- 2026.4.5
- 2026.4.7
- 2026.4.8
- 2026.4.9
- 2026.4.10
- 2026.4.12
- 2026.4.14
- 2026.4.15
- 2026.4.20
- 2026.4.21
- 2026.4.22
- 2026.4.23
- 2026.4.24
- 2026.4.25
- 2026.4.26
- 2026.4.27
- 2026.4.29
- 2026.5.2
- 2026.5.3
- 2026.5.4
- 2026.5.6
- 2026.5.7
- 2026.5.12
- 2026.5.18
- 2026.5.19
- 2026.5.20
- 2026.5.22
- 2026.5.26
- 2026.5.27
- 2026.5.28
- 2026.6.1
- 2026.6.5
- 2026.6.6
- 2026.6.8
- 2026.6.9
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 5.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 8.0
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: openclaw 2026.7.1
Timeline
09/26/2026 Advisory disclosed09/26/2026 CVE reserved
09/26/2026 VulDB entry created
09/26/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-100585 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-100585
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-410581
Entry
Created: 09/26/2026 05:34Changes: 09/26/2026 05:34 (76)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.