Studio-Saelix Sencho up to 0.94.1 git-sources Browse API Endpoint outboundTarget.ts repo_url server-side request forgery ⚔ [Disputed]

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
3.9$0-$5k1.07

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Studio-Saelix Sencho up to 0.94.1. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file outboundTarget.ts of the component git-sources Browse API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument repo_url leads to server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-108523. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. There are still doubts about whether this vulnerability truly exists. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue. The vendor explains: "Git repository access is an intentional, privileged administrative function. Sencho explicitly supports repositories hosted on private LAN, VPC, VPN, CGNAT, and IPv6 ULA networks. The report does not demonstrate a privilege-boundary bypass or access by an unprivileged user. We therefore dispute the CVE characterization of this behavior. As defense in depth, we have nevertheless hardened repository access. Git HTTPS and SSH connections now validate and pin DNS resolution, reject loopback, link-local, multicast, selected special-use and metadata targets, disable redirects and inherited proxy routing, and retain strict SSH host-key verification."

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Studio-Saelix Sencho up to 0.94.1. This issue affects an unknown code of the file outboundTarget.ts of the component git-sources Browse API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument repo_url with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Impacted is confidentiality.

The advisory is shared at gist.github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-108523. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.

The exploit is available at gist.github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The vendor explains: "Git repository access is an intentional, privileged administrative function. Sencho explicitly supports repositories hosted on private LAN, VPC, VPN, CGNAT, and IPv6 ULA networks. The report does not demonstrate a privilege-boundary bypass or access by an unprivileged user. We therefore dispute the CVE characterization of this behavior. As defense in depth, we have nevertheless hardened repository access. Git HTTPS and SSH connections now validate and pin DNS resolution, reject loopback, link-local, multicast, selected special-use and metadata targets, disable redirects and inherited proxy routing, and retain strict SSH host-key verification."

Applying the patch 79b86ddcd4aefdd6941f098e35990ab397b13c72 is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at github.com.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Server-side request forgery
CWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Patch
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Patch: 79b86ddcd4aefdd6941f098e35990ab397b13c72

Timelineinfo

10/10/2026 Advisory disclosed
10/10/2026 +0 days VulDB entry created
10/10/2026 +0 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Product: github.com

Advisory: gist.github.com
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔒
Disputed: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2026-108523 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-108523
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-416189
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013

Entryinfo

Created: 10/10/2026 14:53
Changes: 10/10/2026 14:53 (62)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: jpazz
Cache ID: 216::103

Submitinfo

Accepted

  • Submit #893367: Studio-Saelix sencho <= 0.94.1 Server-Side Request Forgery (by jpazz)

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you want to use VulDB in your project?

Use the official API to access entries easily!