1Panel-dev CordysCRM up to 1.9.3 poc_approval_flow_webhook_test_ssrf.py server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 2.70+ |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in 1Panel-dev CordysCRM up to 1.9.3. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file poc_approval_flow_webhook_test_ssrf.py. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-108702. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in 1Panel-dev CordysCRM up to 1.9.3. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code of the file poc_approval_flow_webhook_test_ssrf.py. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
1Panel-dev CordysCRM through 1.9.3 lacks a PROCESS_SETTING permission check on POST /approval-flow/webhook/test, allowing any authenticated user to trigger server-side requests to attacker-supplied URLs. Attackers can redirect GET requests from a controlled host to bypass SSRFValidator and probe internal addresses through success or failure results.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-108702 since 10/11/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 10/11/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.3
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
10/11/2026 Advisory disclosed10/11/2026 CVE reserved
10/11/2026 VulDB entry created
10/11/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-108702 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-108702
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-416483
Entry
Created: 10/11/2026 04:10Changes: 10/11/2026 04:10 (74)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.