SUSE Rancher/Rancher Webhook inheritedNamespacedRules privileges management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $5k-$25k | 3.78- |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in SUSE Rancher and Rancher Webhook and classified as critical. The affected element is an unknown function. The manipulation of the argument inheritedNamespacedRules results in privileges management. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-88810. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in SUSE Rancher and Rancher Webhook (the affected version is unknown). Affected is an unknown code. The manipulation of the argument inheritedNamespacedRules with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
A privilege escalation issue was discovered in Rancher Manager's role-based access control. The inheritedNamespacedRules field of a GlobalRole propagates permissions into named namespaces of every downstream cluster managed by the Rancher instance, but it was not subject to the privilege-escalation validation applied to the other permission-carrying fields of a GlobalRole. As a result, a non-administrative user could be granted, through a global role binding, permissions in downstream clusters that exceed the permissions that user already holds. This affected SUSE Rancher 2.15.2 only, and SUSE Rancher Webhook 0.11.0 up to 0.11.4, and 0.12.0 up to 0.12.1.
The advisory is available at github.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-88810 since 09/10/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Technical details are known, but there is no available exploit. The structure of the vulnerability defines a possible price range of USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/02/2026). This vulnerability is assigned to T1068 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.suse.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.4
VulDB Temp Score: 7.4
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.2
CNA Vector (suse): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
09/10/2026 CVE reserved11/02/2026 Advisory disclosed
11/02/2026 VulDB entry created
11/02/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: suse.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CNA: suse
CVE: CVE-2026-88810 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-88810
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-429930
Entry
Created: 11/02/2026 17:53Changes: 11/02/2026 17:53 (61)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.