Quest Foglight for Databases 8.2.0 UnzipFile unzipFile path traversal
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 | $0-$5k | 0.75+ |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as very critical has been detected in Quest Foglight for Databases 8.2.0. This impacts the function unzipFile of the component UnzipFile. The manipulation leads to path traversal.
This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2026-92197. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Quest Foglight for Databases 8.2.0. It has been rated as very critical. This issue affects the function unzipFile of the component UnzipFile. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Quest Foglight for Databases unzipFile Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Quest Foglight for Databases. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the unzipFile method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied path prior to using it in file operations. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-29901.
The advisory is shared at zerodayinitiative.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-92197 since 09/15/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/04/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.quest.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.4
VulDB Base Score: 9.9
VulDB Temp Score: 9.9
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 8.8
CNA Vector (zdi): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
09/15/2026 CVE reserved11/04/2026 Advisory disclosed
11/04/2026 VulDB entry created
11/04/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: quest.comAdvisory: zerodayinitiative.com
Status: Not defined
CNA: zdi
CVE: CVE-2026-92197 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-92197
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-430901
Entry
Created: 11/04/2026 01:08Changes: 11/04/2026 01:08 (62)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.