CA Business Protection Suite up to R2 asdbapi.dll input validation

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.0$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in CA Business Protection Suite up to R2. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function in the library asdbapi.dll. The manipulation leads to input validation. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2008-4399. There is no available exploit.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in CA Business Protection Suite up to R2 and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code block in the library asdbapi.dll. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:

Unspecified vulnerability in the database engine service in asdbapi.dll in CA ARCserve Backup (formerly BrightStor ARCserve Backup) r11.1 through r12.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted request, related to "insufficient validation."

The bug was discovered 10/09/2008. The weakness was presented 10/14/2008 by eEye Digital Security with eEye Digital Security (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at support.ca.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2008-4399 since 10/02/2008. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/19/2019).

It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 5 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product. Furthermore it is possible to detect and prevent this kind of attack with TippingPoint and the filter 6526.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (45776), SecurityFocus (BID 31684†), OSVDB (49470†), Secunia (SA32220†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1021032†). See VDB-44484, VDB-44482 and VDB-44481 for similar entries. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0

VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Input validation
CWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍
TippingPoint: 🔍

McAfee IPS: 🔍
McAfee IPS Version: 🔍

ISS Proventia IPS: 🔍
PaloAlto IPS: 🔍
Fortigate IPS: 🔍

Timelineinfo

10/02/2008 🔍
10/09/2008 +7 days 🔍
10/09/2008 +0 days 🔍
10/09/2008 +0 days 🔍
10/10/2008 +1 days 🔍
10/10/2008 +0 days 🔍
10/14/2008 +4 days 🔍
10/14/2008 +0 days 🔍
10/20/2008 +6 days 🔍
03/17/2015 +2339 days 🔍
08/19/2019 +1616 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: ca.com

Advisory: support.ca.com
Researcher: eEye Digital Security
Organization: eEye Digital Security
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2008-4399 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-4399
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-44483

IAVM: 🔍

X-Force: 45776
SecurityFocus: 31684 - Computer Associates ARCserve Backup Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 32220
OSVDB: 49470 - CA ARCserve Backup database engine denial of service
SecurityTracker: 1021032
Vulnerability Center: 19786 - CA ARCserve Backup r11.1-r12.0 Database Engine Service in asdbapi.dll Remote DoS Vulnerability, High
Vupen: ADV-2008-2777

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/17/2015 16:11
Updated: 08/19/2019 09:19
Changes: 03/17/2015 16:11 (78), 08/19/2019 09:19 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:3F4:103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!