| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in SAP Crystal Reports Server up to 2008. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing. This manipulation causes memory corruption. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2009-3346. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in SAP Crystal Reports Server up to 2008 (Reporting Software) and classified as very critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Unspecified vulnerability in SAP Crystal Reports Server 2008 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, as demonstrated by a certain module in VulnDisco Pack Professional 8.3 through 8.11. NOTE: as of 20090917, this disclosure has no actionable information. However, because the VulnDisco Pack author is a reliable researcher, the issue is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.
The weakness was disclosed 09/24/2009 with Intevydis (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2009-3346 since 09/24/2009. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 12/17/2017).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 36267†) and Secunia (SA36583†). The entries VDB-50196 and VDB-50195 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.sap.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/03/2009 🔍09/24/2009 🔍
09/24/2009 🔍
09/24/2009 🔍
03/18/2015 🔍
12/17/2017 🔍
Sources
Vendor: sap.comAdvisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Organization: Intevydis
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2009-3346 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2009-3346
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-50197
SecurityFocus: 36267 - SAP Crystal Reports Server Multiple Unspecified Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 36583
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20150716
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/18/2015 15:15Updated: 12/17/2017 10:10
Changes: 03/18/2015 15:15 (47), 12/17/2017 10:10 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.