| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in RADactive I-Load up to 2008.2.1.0. Affected is an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2009-3450. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in RADactive I-Load up to 2008.2.1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in WebCoreModule.ashx in RADactive I-Load before 2008.2.5.0 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via parameters with names beginning with __ (underscore underscore) sequences, which are incompatible with an XSS protection mechanism provided by Microsoft ASP.NET.
The weakness was shared 09/17/2009 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2009-3450 since 09/29/2009. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 2008.2.1.1 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published before and not just after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at OSVDB (58195†) and Secunia (SA23807†). The entries VDB-50271, VDB-50270 and VDB-50266 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: I-Load 2008.2.1.1
Timeline
09/17/2009 🔍09/17/2009 🔍
09/18/2009 🔍
09/18/2009 🔍
09/29/2009 🔍
09/29/2009 🔍
03/18/2015 🔍
08/23/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2009-3450 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2009-3450
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-50269
X-Force: 53348
Secunia: 23807 - RADactive I-Load Multiple Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 58195 - RADactive I-Load WebcodeModule.ashx Multiple Parameter XSS
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/18/2015 15:15Updated: 08/23/2021 10:25
Changes: 03/18/2015 15:15 (46), 09/02/2017 10:37 (11), 08/23/2021 10:25 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.