| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch up to 9.x. It has been declared as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in input validation. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-1562. No exploit is available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch up to 9.x. Affected is some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. This is going to have an impact on availability. CVE summarizes:
The SIP implementation on the Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch with software 9.7(3)S before 9.7(3)S9 and 9.7(3)P before 9.7(3)P9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via a malformed Contact header, aka Bug ID CSCsj98521.
The weakness was published 05/13/2010 with Cisco (Website). The advisory is shared for download at cisco.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2010-1562. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available.
Upgrading to version 9.7%283%29p eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 40124†), OSVDB (64684†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-25757†). Similar entries are available at VDB-53223, VDB-53222, VDB-53221 and VDB-53219. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Upgrade: PGW 2200 Softswitch 9.7%283%29p
Timeline
04/27/2010 🔍05/12/2010 🔍
05/12/2010 🔍
05/13/2010 🔍
05/13/2010 🔍
05/13/2010 🔍
05/14/2010 🔍
05/17/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
09/13/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: cisco.com
Organization: Cisco
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2010-1562 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-1562
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-53220
SecurityFocus: 40124 - Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch Malformed Contact Header Denial of Service Vulnerability
OSVDB: 64684 - Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch SIP Packet Contact Header DoS
Vulnerability Center: 25757 - [Cisco-sa-20100512-pgw] Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch DoS Vulnerability via a Malformed Contact Header, High
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 12:22Updated: 09/13/2021 15:17
Changes: 03/19/2015 12:22 (53), 02/24/2017 12:12 (9), 09/13/2021 15:17 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.