| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch up to 9.x. It has been rated as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. This manipulation causes input validation. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2010-1563. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch up to 9.x and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
The SIP implementation on the Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch with software 9.7(3)S before 9.7(3)S9 and 9.7(3)P before 9.7(3)P9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via a malformed header, aka Bug ID CSCsk04588.
The weakness was released 05/13/2010 with Cisco (Website). The advisory is shared at cisco.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-1563. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Upgrading to version 9.7%283%29p eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 40125†), OSVDB (64683†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-25756†). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-53223, VDB-53222, VDB-53220 and VDB-53219. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: PGW 2200 Softswitch 9.7%283%29p
Timeline
04/27/2010 🔍05/12/2010 🔍
05/12/2010 🔍
05/13/2010 🔍
05/13/2010 🔍
05/14/2010 🔍
05/17/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
09/13/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: cisco.com
Organization: Cisco
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2010-1563 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-1563
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-53221
SecurityFocus: 40125 - Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch Malformed Header Denial of Service Vulnerability
OSVDB: 64683 - Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch Unspecified SIP Packet Handling DoS (CVE-2010-1563)
Vulnerability Center: 25756 - [cisco-sa-20100512-pgw] Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch Remote DoS Vulnerability via a Malformed Header, High
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 12:22Updated: 09/13/2021 15:22
Changes: 03/19/2015 12:22 (52), 02/24/2017 11:06 (9), 09/13/2021 15:22 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.