Llnl Slurm up to 2.1.13 LD_LIBRARY_PATH Local Privilege Escalation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Llnl Slurm. The affected element is an unknown function in the library LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The manipulation leads to Local Privilege Escalation. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2010-3380. The attack must be carried out locally. There is no available exploit. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Llnl Slurm. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown code in the library LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a local privilege escalation vulnerability. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The (1) init.d/slurm and (2) init.d/slurmdbd scripts in SLURM before 2.1.14 place the . (dot) directory in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse shared library in the current working directory.
The bug was discovered 09/26/2010. The weakness was presented 09/29/2010 by Raphael Geissert (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2010-3380 since 09/15/2010. Attacking locally is a requirement. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 3 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading to version 2.1.5 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 43537†), OSVDB (68258†) and Secunia (SA41614†). Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 1.3.10
- 1.3.11
- 1.3.12
- 1.3.13
- 1.3.14
- 1.3.15
- 2.0.0
- 2.0.1
- 2.0.2
- 2.0.3
- 2.0.4
- 2.0.5
- 2.0.6
- 2.0.7
- 2.0.8
- 2.0.9
- 2.1.0
- 2.1.1
- 2.1.2
- 2.1.4
- 2.1.5
- 2.1.6
- 2.1.7
- 2.1.8
- 2.1.9
- 2.1.10
- 2.1.11
- 2.1.12
- 2.1.13
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.0
VulDB Base Score: 8.4
VulDB Temp Score: 8.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Local Privilege EscalationCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Slurm 2.1.5
Timeline
09/15/2010 🔍09/26/2010 🔍
09/28/2010 🔍
09/29/2010 🔍
09/29/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
07/28/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Raphael Geissert
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2010-3380 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-3380
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-54863
SecurityFocus: 43537 - SLURM 'slurm' and 'slurmdbd' Multiple Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 41614
OSVDB: 68258 - SLURM LD_LIBRARY_PATH privilege escalation
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 14:37Updated: 07/28/2019 22:47
Changes: 03/19/2015 14:37 (55), 07/28/2019 22:47 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.