Red Hat Enterprise MRG up to 1.1.0 Cluster::deliveredEvent denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Red Hat Enterprise MRG up to 1.1.0 and classified as problematic. Impacted is the function Cluster::deliveredEvent. This manipulation causes denial of service.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2009-5005. There is no available exploit.
The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Red Hat Enterprise MRG up to 1.1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Cluster::deliveredEvent. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
The Cluster::deliveredEvent function in cluster/Cluster.cpp in Apache Qpid, as used in Red Hat Enterprise MRG before 1.3 and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash and cluster outage) via invalid AMQP data.
The weakness was presented 10/18/2010 with Red Hat (Website). The advisory is shared at rhn.redhat.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2009-5005 since 10/12/2010. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading to version 1.1.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 44113†), Secunia (SA41710†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-30128†). See VDB-55094 and VDB-54967 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.redhat.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Enterprise MRG 1.1.1
Timeline
10/08/2010 🔍10/12/2010 🔍
10/14/2010 🔍
10/14/2010 🔍
10/18/2010 🔍
10/18/2010 🔍
03/06/2011 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
09/27/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: redhat.comAdvisory: RHSA-2010:0773
Organization: Red Hat
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2009-5005 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2009-5005
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-55093
SecurityFocus: 44113 - Red Hat Enterprise MRG Messaging Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 41710 - Apache Qpid Denial of Service Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
Vulnerability Center: 30128 - Red Hat Enterprise MRG Prior to 1.3 Remote DoS Vulnerability via Invalid AMQP Data, Medium
Vupen: ADV-2010-2684
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 14:37Updated: 09/27/2021 09:37
Changes: 03/19/2015 14:37 (52), 03/17/2017 07:33 (14), 09/27/2021 09:37 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:772:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.