| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in VIM GVim and classified as critical. This impacts an unknown function in the library User32.dll. Performing a manipulation results in untrusted search path. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2010-3914. No exploit exists. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, was found in VIM GVim (Word Processing Software). This affects an unknown part in the library User32.dll. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a untrusted search path vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-426. The product searches for critical resources using an externally-supplied search path that can point to resources that are not under the product's direct control. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Untrusted search path vulnerability in VIM Development Group GVim before 7.3.034, and possibly other versions before 7.3.46, allows local users, and possibly remote attackers, to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse User32.dll or other DLL that is located in the same folder as a .TXT file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
The weakness was disclosed 11/03/2010 (Website). The advisory is shared at jvn.jp. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2010-3914 since 10/12/2010. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/08/2019). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1574 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 7.3.028 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 44588†) and Secunia (SA42084†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 7.3.01
- 7.3.010
- 7.3.011
- 7.3.012
- 7.3.013
- 7.3.014
- 7.3.015
- 7.3.016
- 7.3.017
- 7.3.018
- 7.3.019
- 7.3.02
- 7.3.020
- 7.3.021
- 7.3.022
- 7.3.023
- 7.3.024
- 7.3.025
- 7.3.026
- 7.3.027
- 7.3.028
- 7.3.029
- 7.3.03
- 7.3.030
- 7.3.031
- 7.3.032
- 7.3.033
- 7.3.04
- 7.3.05
- 7.3.06
- 7.3.07
- 7.3.08
- 7.3.09
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.5
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 9.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Untrusted search pathCWE: CWE-426
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: GVim 7.3.028
Timeline
10/12/2010 🔍11/01/2010 🔍
11/03/2010 🔍
11/03/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
02/08/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jvn.jpStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2010-3914 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-3914
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-55317
SecurityFocus: 44588 - GVim DLL Loading Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability
Secunia: 42084
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 14:37Updated: 02/08/2019 10:22
Changes: 03/19/2015 14:37 (54), 02/08/2019 10:22 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.