Django up to 1.2.4 Browser Plugin cross-site request forgery

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.0$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Django up to 1.2.4. It has been rated as problematic. This impacts an unknown function of the component Browser Plugin. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2011-0696. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Django up to 1.2.4 (Content Management System). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown function of the component Browser Plugin. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447.

The weakness was presented 02/14/2011 as Bug 676357 as not defined bug report (Bugzilla). It is possible to read the advisory at bugzilla.redhat.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2011-0696. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 52022 (Ubuntu 9.10 / 10.04 LTS / 10.10 : python-django vulnerabilities (USN-1066-1)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Ubuntu Local Security Checks.

Upgrading to version 1.1.2 eliminates this vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (52022), SecurityFocus (BID 46296†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-29844†). See VDB-56485 and VDB-56484 for similar entries. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cross-site request forgery
CWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 52022
Nessus Name: Ubuntu 9.10 / 10.04 LTS / 10.10 : python-django vulnerabilities (USN-1066-1)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍

OpenVAS ID: 68996
OpenVAS Name: Debian Security Advisory DSA 2163-1 (python-django)
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: Django 1.1.2

Timelineinfo

01/31/2011 🔍
02/09/2011 +9 days 🔍
02/09/2011 +0 days 🔍
02/14/2011 +5 days 🔍
02/14/2011 +0 days 🔍
02/18/2011 +4 days 🔍
02/20/2011 +2 days 🔍
03/20/2015 +1489 days 🔍
10/17/2021 +2403 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: Bug 676357
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2011-0696 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2011-0696
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-56483

OVAL: 🔍

SecurityFocus: 46296 - Django Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 43230
Vulnerability Center: 29844 - Django 1.1-1.1.3 and 1.2-1.2.4 Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerability via Forged AJAX Requests, Medium

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/20/2015 16:16
Updated: 10/17/2021 06:35
Changes: 03/20/2015 16:16 (62), 03/16/2017 15:26 (9), 10/17/2021 06:21 (5), 10/17/2021 06:35 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:355:103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!