| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in IBM Lotus Expeditor up to 6.2.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Help. Performing a manipulation results in path traversal. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2012-0186. No exploit exists. You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in IBM Lotus Expeditor up to 6.2.2 (Groupware Software). This affects some unknown functionality of the component Help. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Directory traversal vulnerability in the Eclipse Help component in IBM Lotus Expeditor 6.1.x and 6.2.x before 6.2 FP5+Security Pack allows remote attackers to discover the locations of files via a crafted URL.
The weakness was disclosed 06/22/2012 (Website). The advisory is shared at xforce.iss.net. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2012-0186 since 12/14/2011. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
It is declared as highly functional.
Upgrading to version 6.2.3 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (72096), SecurityFocus (BID 54164†) and Secunia (SA49624†). The entries VDB-61079 and VDB-61078 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.ibm.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Lotus Expeditor 6.2.3
Timeline
12/14/2011 🔍06/22/2012 🔍
06/22/2012 🔍
06/22/2012 🔍
06/22/2012 🔍
03/23/2015 🔍
01/10/2018 🔍
Sources
Vendor: ibm.comAdvisory: xforce.iss.net
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2012-0186 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-0186
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-61077
X-Force: 72096 - IBM Lotus Expeditor Eclipse Help component directory traversal
SecurityFocus: 54164 - IBM Lotus Expeditor 'Eclipse Help' Component Directory Traversal Vulnerability
Secunia: 49624 - IBM Lotus Expeditor Multiple Vulnerabilities, Highly Critical
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/23/2015 16:50Updated: 01/10/2018 08:13
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (54), 01/10/2018 08:13 (9)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.