VirusBuster Virusbuster Internet Securit Suite 3.2 Malware Detection Product race condition ⚔ [Disputed]
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in VirusBuster Virusbuster Internet Securit Suite 3.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Malware Detection. This manipulation of the argument Product causes race condition. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2010-5182. No exploit exists. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.
Details
A vulnerability was found in VirusBuster Virusbuster Internet Securit Suite 3.2 (Anti-Malware Software). It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the component Malware Detection. The manipulation of the argument Product with an unknown input leads to a race condition vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-362. The product contains a code sequence that can run concurrently with other code, and the code sequence requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence that is operating concurrently. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
** DISPUTED ** Race condition in VirusBuster Internet Security Suite 3.2 on Windows XP allows local users to bypass kernel-mode hook handlers, and execute dangerous code that would otherwise be blocked by a handler but not blocked by signature-based malware detection, via certain user-space memory changes during hook-handler execution, aka an argument-switch attack or a KHOBE attack. NOTE: this issue is disputed by some third parties because it is a flaw in a protection mechanism for situations where a crafted program has already begun to execute.
The weakness was disclosed 05/05/2010 (Website). The advisory is shared at theregister.co.uk. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-5182 since 08/25/2012. The exploitation appears to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 39924†) and OSVDB (67660†). The entries VDB-61839, VDB-61838, VDB-61836 and VDB-61835 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.4
VulDB Temp Score: 7.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Race conditionCWE: CWE-362
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/05/2010 🔍05/05/2010 🔍
05/29/2010 🔍
08/25/2012 🔍
08/25/2012 🔍
03/23/2015 🔍
08/16/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: theregister.co.ukStatus: Not defined
Disputed: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2010-5182 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-5182
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-61837
SecurityFocus: 39924 - Multiple Vendor Argument Switch Security Bypass Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: 67660 - Multiple Security Product Argument Switch Race Condition Scan Bypass
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/23/2015 16:50Updated: 08/16/2018 07:28
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (51), 08/16/2018 07:28 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.