| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in OpenEMR 4.0.0/4.1.0/4.1.1. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file setup.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument site results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2011-5160. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability was found in OpenEMR 4.0.0/4.1.0/4.1.1 (Business Process Management Software). It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing of the file setup.php. The manipulation of the argument site with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in setup.php in OpenEMR 4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the site parameter.
The weakness was disclosed 09/09/2012 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at exploit-db.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2011-5160 since 09/09/2012. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:setup.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (71982), Exploit-DB (18274) and OSVDB (78132†). The entries VDB-62193 and VDB-62188 are pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/09/2012 🔍09/09/2012 🔍
09/09/2012 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
12/29/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: exploit-db.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2011-5160 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2011-5160
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-62187
X-Force: 71982
OSVDB: 78132
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 12/29/2024 22:32
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (50), 02/21/2019 09:36 (4), 12/29/2024 22:32 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:8C0:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.