| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Trevor Mckay Cumin up to 0.1.5192-4. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation results in cryptographic issue. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2012-2681. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Trevor Mckay Cumin up to 0.1.5192-4. This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cryptographic issue vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-310. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, and integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cumin before 0.1.5444, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Messaging, Realtime, and Grid (MRG) 2.0, uses predictable random numbers to generate session keys, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the session key.
The weakness was shared 09/28/2012 by Florian Weimer (Website). The advisory is shared at rhn.redhat.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2012-2681 since 05/14/2012. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 76649 (RHEL 5 : MRG (RHSA-2012:1278)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Red Hat Local Security Checks and running in the context l.
Upgrading to version 0.1.4369-1 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published even before and not after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (78771), Tenable (76649), SecurityFocus (BID 55618†) and Secunia (SA50660†). The entries VDB-62478, VDB-62477, VDB-62476 and VDB-62475 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 5.4
VulDB Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cryptographic issueCWE: CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 76649
Nessus Name: RHEL 5 : MRG (RHSA-2012:1278)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Cumin 0.1.4369-1
Timeline
05/14/2012 🔍09/19/2012 🔍
09/19/2012 🔍
09/28/2012 🔍
09/28/2012 🔍
07/22/2014 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
12/14/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: RHSA-2012:1278Researcher: Florian Weimer
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2012-2681 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-2681
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-62469
X-Force: 78771
SecurityFocus: 55618 - Cumin Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 50660
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 12/14/2021 12:51
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (62), 02/22/2019 12:24 (1), 12/14/2021 12:51 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.