| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Finesse. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. This manipulation causes credentials management. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2013-3455. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Cisco Finesse (unknown version). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a credentials management vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-255. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Cisco Finesse allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network for HTTP query data, aka Bug ID CSCug16732.
The weakness was disclosed 08/12/2013 (Website). The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2013-3455 since 05/06/2013. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/04/2022). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1552 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at X-Force (86357). The entry VDB-64658 is pretty similar. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Credentials managementCWE: CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/06/2013 🔍08/12/2013 🔍
08/12/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
01/04/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: tools.cisco.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2013-3455 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-3455
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-64657
X-Force: 86357
SecurityTracker: 1028897
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 01/04/2022 13:16
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (44), 03/15/2019 20:03 (2), 01/04/2022 13:16 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.