Cisco EPC3925 cross-site request forgery

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.7$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Cisco EPC3925. Impacted is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2013-6976. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Cisco EPC3925 (affected version unknown). This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in goform/Quick_setup on Cisco EPC3925 devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change a password via the Password and PasswordReEnter parameters, aka Bug ID CSCuh37496.

The weakness was shared 12/19/2013 (Website). The advisory is shared at exploit-db.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2013-6976 since 12/05/2013. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.

A public exploit has been developed by Jeroen - IT Nerdbox and been published before and not just after the advisory. The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 3 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (30362), SecurityFocus (BID 64341†), OSVDB (101097†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-42730†). The entry VDB-11533 is related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cross-site request forgery
CWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: Jeroen - IT Nerdbox
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Exploit-DB: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍
Fortigate IPS: 🔍

Timelineinfo

12/05/2013 🔍
12/16/2013 +11 days 🔍
12/16/2013 +0 days 🔍
12/19/2013 +3 days 🔍
12/19/2013 +0 days 🔍
12/19/2013 +0 days 🔍
12/25/2013 +6 days 🔍
03/24/2015 +454 days 🔍
08/24/2024 +3441 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: cisco.com

Advisory: 124449
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2013-6976 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-6976
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-65829
SecurityFocus: 64341
OSVDB: 101097
Vulnerability Center: 42730 - Cisco EPC Router Remote CSRF Vulnerability to Change Admin Password, Medium

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/24/2015 15:54
Updated: 08/24/2024 23:20
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (53), 05/18/2017 17:33 (9), 01/18/2022 08:07 (3), 08/24/2024 23:20 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:6CB:103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you want to use VulDB in your project?

Use the official API to access entries easily!