Siemens SIMATIC Wincc Open Architecture up to 3.11 memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Siemens SIMATIC Wincc Open Architecture up to 3.11. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2014-1697. There is not any exploit available. You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Siemens SIMATIC Wincc Open Architecture up to 3.11 (SCADA Software). This issue affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The integrated web server in Siemens SIMATIC WinCC OA before 3.12 P002 January allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 4999.
The weakness was released 02/06/2014 (Website). The advisory is shared at ics-cert.us-cert.gov. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2014-1697 since 01/29/2014. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Upgrading to version 3.12 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (90933), SecurityFocus (BID 65351†), OSVDB (102810†) and Secunia (SA56651†). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-66343, VDB-66342 and VDB-66340. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.siemens.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: SIMATIC Wincc Open Architecture 3.12
Timeline
01/29/2014 🔍02/04/2014 🔍
02/04/2014 🔍
02/06/2014 🔍
02/06/2014 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
02/01/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: siemens.comAdvisory: ssa-342587
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2014-1697 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-1697
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-66341
X-Force: 90933 - Siemens SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture Web server code execution
SecurityFocus: 65351 - SIEMENS SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture Unspecified Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability
Secunia: 56651 - Siemens SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture Multiple Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 102810
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 02/01/2022 13:55
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (55), 02/27/2018 03:10 (7), 02/01/2022 13:55 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.