| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Leon Weber pyxtrlock 0.1 and classified as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation of the argument incorrect can lead to denial of service. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2013-4426. There is no exploit available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Leon Weber pyxtrlock 0.1. This vulnerability affects an unknown code. The manipulation of the argument incorrect with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, and availability. CVE summarizes:
pyxtrlock before 0.1 uses an incorrect variable name, which allows physically proximate attackers to bypass the lock screen via multiple failed authentication attempts, which trigger a crash.
The weakness was shared 05/19/2014 (Website). The advisory is shared for download at github.com. This vulnerability was named CVE-2013-4426 since 06/12/2013. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack needs to be approached locally. No form of authentication is required for a successful exploitation. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available.
Upgrading to version 0.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
The entry VDB-69725 is related to this item. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Base Score: 5.1
VulDB Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: pyxtrlock 0.1
Timeline
06/12/2013 🔍05/19/2014 🔍
05/19/2014 🔍
03/25/2015 🔍
03/25/2015 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-4426 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-4426
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-69724
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/25/2015 16:45Changes: 03/25/2015 16:45 (50)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:9B2:103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.