Beetel 450TC2 Router Tx6-0q-005 Retail cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Beetel 450TC2 Router Tx6-0q-005 Retail. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2014-3792. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Beetel 450TC2 Router Tx6-0q-005 Retail (Router Operating System) and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Beetel 450TC2 Router with firmware TX6-0Q-005_retail allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via the uiViewTools_Password and uiViewTools_PasswordConfirm parameters to Forms/tools_admin_1.
The weakness was published 05/20/2014 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at exploit-db.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2014-3792 since 05/20/2014. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
A public exploit has been developed by shyamkumar somana and been published before and not just after the advisory. The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 20 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (33129), OSVDB (106468†) and Secunia (SA58365†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: shyamkumar somana
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/30/2014 🔍04/30/2014 🔍
05/20/2014 🔍
05/20/2014 🔍
05/20/2014 🔍
03/25/2015 🔍
08/18/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: 126426Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2014-3792 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-3792
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-69755
Secunia: 58365
OSVDB: 106468
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/25/2015 16:45Updated: 08/18/2024 22:51
Changes: 03/25/2015 16:45 (49), 03/02/2018 09:50 (7), 03/21/2022 15:57 (3), 08/18/2024 22:51 (14)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.