Hans Alshoff MinaliC 2.0.0 Session response.c retrieve_physical_file_name_or_brows memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Hans Alshoff MinaliC 2.0.0. It has been classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function retrieve_physical_file_name_or_brows of the file response.c of the component Session. This manipulation causes memory corruption.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2012-0273. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Hans Alshoff MinaliC 2.0.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function retrieve_physical_file_name_or_brows of the file response.c of the component Session. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in MinaliC 2.0.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a (1) session_id cookie in a request to the get_cookie_value function in response.c, (2) directory name in a request to the add_default_file function in response.c, or (3) file name in a request to the retrieve_physical_file_name_or_brows function in response.c.
The weakness was disclosed 06/20/2014 with Secunia Research (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2012-0273 since 12/30/2011. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (74653), SecurityFocus (BID 52873†) and Secunia (SA45462†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
OpenVAS ID: 100872
OpenVAS Name: MinaliC Host Header Handling Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/30/2011 🔍04/04/2012 🔍
04/04/2012 🔍
06/20/2014 🔍
06/20/2014 🔍
03/26/2015 🔍
03/10/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Organization: Secunia Research
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2012-0273 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-0273
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-70117
X-Force: 74653
SecurityFocus: 52873 - MinaliC Multiple Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 45462 - MinaliC Three Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities, Highly Critical
Entry
Created: 03/26/2015 12:07Updated: 03/10/2019 19:44
Changes: 03/26/2015 12:07 (61), 03/10/2019 19:44 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Duplicate
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.