IBM Algo Credit Limits up to 4.7.0 cross-site request forgery

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.0$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in IBM Algo Credit Limits up to 4.7.0. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2014-0864. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in IBM Algo Credit Limits up to 4.7.0. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Executer in RICOS in IBM Algo Credit Limits (aka ACLM) 4.5.0 through 4.7.0 before 4.7.0.03 FP5 in IBM Algorithmics allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change (1) a deal s currency or (2) a limit via a crafted XML document.

The weakness was published 07/07/2014 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at sec-consult.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2014-0864 since 01/06/2014. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.

A public exploit has been developed by SEC Consult and been published even before and not after the advisory. The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as highly functional. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 6 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (90938), Exploit-DB (33942), SecurityFocus (BID 68262†) and Secunia (SA59296†). Similar entries are available at VDB-70284, VDB-70282, VDB-70281 and VDB-70280. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cross-site request forgery
CWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Highly functional
Author: SEC Consult
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Exploit-DB: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

01/06/2014 🔍
07/01/2014 +176 days 🔍
07/01/2014 +0 days 🔍
07/07/2014 +6 days 🔍
07/07/2014 +0 days 🔍
03/26/2015 +262 days 🔍
10/06/2024 +3482 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: ibm.com

Advisory: 127304
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2014-0864 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-0864
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-70275
X-Force: 90938 - IBM Algo Credit Limits ACLM WEB GUI cross-site request forgery
SecurityFocus: 68262
Secunia: 59296

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/26/2015 12:07
Updated: 10/06/2024 03:13
Changes: 03/26/2015 12:07 (58), 03/07/2018 09:44 (3), 03/24/2022 13:12 (3), 10/06/2024 03:13 (14)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:794:103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Want to know what is going to be exploited?

We predict KEV entries!