Best Practical RT 4.2.0/4.2.1/4.2.2 Email::Address::List numeric error
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Best Practical RT 4.2.0/4.2.1/4.2.2. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function Email::Address::List. This manipulation causes numeric error.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2014-1474. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Best Practical RT 4.2.0/4.2.1/4.2.2 (Ticket Tracking Software) and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Email::Address::List. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a numeric error vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-189. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in Email::Address::List before 0.02, as used in RT 4.2.0 through 4.2.2, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a string without an address.
The weakness was disclosed 07/15/2014 (Website). The advisory is shared at metacpan.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2014-1474 since 01/16/2014. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 72155 (FreeBSD : rt42 -- denial-of-service attack via the email gateway (d1dfc4c7-8791-11e3-a371-6805ca0b3d42)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family FreeBSD Local Security Checks.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (72155) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-43944†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Numeric errorCWE: CWE-189
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 72155
Nessus Name: FreeBSD : rt42 -- denial-of-service attack via the email gateway (d1dfc4c7-8791-11e3-a371-6805ca0b3d42)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 801857
OpenVAS Name: Request Tracker (RT) Email::Address::List Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/16/2014 🔍01/27/2014 🔍
01/28/2014 🔍
04/08/2014 🔍
07/15/2014 🔍
07/15/2014 🔍
03/26/2015 🔍
03/24/2022 🔍
Sources
Advisory: metacpan.orgStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2014-1474 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-1474
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-70357
Vulnerability Center: 43944 - Best Practical Solutions RT 4.2.0 through 4.2.2 Remote DoS via the Email Gateway, Medium
Entry
Created: 03/26/2015 12:07Updated: 03/24/2022 18:37
Changes: 03/26/2015 12:07 (62), 05/24/2017 11:35 (2), 03/24/2022 18:37 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.