| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in FTGate4. This affects an unknown part of the file licence.fts. This manipulation of the argument param1 causes cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in FTGate4 (the affected version is unknown). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the file licence.fts. The manipulation of the argument param1 with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. As an impact it is known to affect integrity.
The bug was discovered 12/01/2005. The weakness was disclosed 12/20/2005 by Tim Shelton (Full-Disclosure). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 19 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 20337 (FTGate <= 4.4.002 Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities (OF, FS, XSS)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family CGI abuses and running in the context r.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (20337), SecurityFocus (BID 15972†) and OSVDB (22106†). The entries VDB-27802, VDB-27801, VDB-27800 and VDB-83436 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 20337
Nessus Name: FTGate <= 4.4.002 Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities (OF, FS, XSS)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/16/2005 🔍12/01/2005 🔍
12/20/2005 🔍
12/21/2005 🔍
12/30/2005 🔍
05/05/2016 🔍
07/28/2022 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Tim Shelton
Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-83437
SecurityFocus: 15972 - Floosietek FTGate Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: 22106 - FTGate4 licence.fts param1 Parameter XSS
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/05/2016 17:51Updated: 07/28/2022 14:04
Changes: 05/05/2016 17:51 (50), 11/13/2018 11:02 (3), 07/28/2022 14:04 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.