| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Content*Builder. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file article2/fullarticle.inc.php. This manipulation of the argument rel causes privileges management. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Content*Builder (Content Management System) (affected version unknown). It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file article2/fullarticle.inc.php. The manipulation of the argument rel with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The weakness was published 06/11/2006 by Federico Fazzi (Website). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
After even before and not, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is possible to download the exploit at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. By approaching the search of inurl:article2/fullarticle.inc.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 18404†), OSVDB (26360†) and Secunia (SA20557†). Similar entries are available at VDB-30943, VDB-30942, VDB-84070 and VDB-84071. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/11/2006 🔍06/11/2006 🔍
06/12/2006 🔍
06/12/2006 🔍
06/13/2006 🔍
05/08/2016 🔍
12/10/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Federico Fazzi
Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-84085
SecurityFocus: 18404 - Content-Builder Multiple Remote File Include Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 20557 - Content*Builder File Inclusion Vulnerabilities, Highly Critical
OSVDB: 26360 - Content*Builder article2/fullarticle.inc.php rel Parameter Remote File Inclusion
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/08/2016 19:45Updated: 12/10/2018 08:25
Changes: 05/08/2016 19:45 (52), 12/10/2018 08:25 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.